| |
Character
Directory
LEAR |
Lear Title character
of King Lear, an ancient king of Britain. Lear rejects Cordelia,
his only honest daughter, when he mistakes her frankness for a lack of
affection. He is then rejected by his other two daughters Regan and
Goneril, to whom he has granted his kingdom, and finds himself wandering
in the wilderness outcast and insane. His prideful wrath has blinded him
to the difference between good and evil, but before the play's end he
recovers his sanity in part, although too late to prevent the tragedy of
Cordelia's death However, in the course of his trials he does come to
recognize his failings, which constitutes the play's most important
lesson.
Lear's descent into
madness, the central event of the play, illustrates the extent to which
humanity can be degraded by its errors. Lear is both victim and
perpetrator, for his own egocentricity has sparked the events that lead to
his collapse; his ensuing suffering is a result of his inadequacy as a
human being Thus his story presents to us a powerful demonstration of
humanity's frailty, and the consequent potential for tragedy in life.
Our horror at Lear's
tale is alleviated somewhat by his partial recognition and acceptance of
his failings Lear s trials have been variously interpreted They may be
seen as comparable to God's punishment for sins; his recognition of his
fault is followed by reconciliation with Cordelia, which is suggestive of
God's forgiveness following a sinner's repentance. That the relief is
accompanied by death suggests the importance of the Christian afterlife
and its eternal mercy but this promise is lacking in Lear's pagan world.
In a non-religious interpretation, Lear's endurance is heroic in itself,
and his triumph lies in his acceptance of his errors before he dies. These
two interpretations are not, of course, mutually exclusive: Lear is heroic
in both senses. Also, most commentators agree that Lear's suffering is
finally redemptive, in that it leads to heightened consciousness on his
part. Further, Lear's last words seem to indicate (though the question is
disputed) that he dies believing that Cordelia is alive which implies a
happy resolution in death akin to that of Gloucester, whose heart 'Burst
smilingly' (5.3. 198), and whose sufferings conspicuously parallel
Lear's.
In the course of his
wanderings, both physical and mental, the distracted Lear is able to
understand his folly. He first recognizes a general lack in his conduct as
a ruler. Raving madly in the storm, Lear suddenly realises that he had
been previously unaware of hunger and homelessness, and he sees that the
knowledge would have been valuable to him as king. He tells himself
'Expose thyself to feel what wretches feel, /That thou mayst shake the
superflux to them, / And show the Heavens more just' (3.4.34-36).
Lear comes to a more
personal acknowledgement of fault, though his progress is fitful. At
first, his guilt takes an unhealthy, morbid form, as he castigates himself
for having fathered his daughters, seeing the fault in the sexual process
rather than in his egotistical demands. While still on the stormy moor, he
declares his torment to be 'Judicious punishment! 'twas this flesh begot /
Those pelican daughters' (3.4.73-74). He elaborates on these sentiments
when he equates female sexuality with the torments of hell, in
4.6.117-128. Lear's attitude towards sex—also displayed by Edgar—is
evidence of the unhealthy mental and moral state of the play's world.
However, before his
lowest point, Lear learns of Cordelia's faithfulness and realises the
wrong he has done her. As Kent reports, 'burning shame' (4.3.46) drives
him from her camp. While wandering in the fields nearby, he encounters the
blinded Gloucester and, stirred by the sight of another sufferer,
acknowledges his own weakness—'they told me I was every thing', he says of
his former courtly flatterers, adding sardonically,' 'tis a lie, I am not
ague-proof (4.6.104-105). Later, as part of his remarks on patience, he
declares the weakness of all humanity, firmly including himself. He is
raving, but the tone of his lament is clear enough; the arrogance that
informed his earlier vow of revenge is entirely gone. Finally, in
Cordelia's presence, he declares himself'a very foolish fond old man'
(4.7.60) and admits that he has wronged her. He asks her to 'forget and
forgive' (4.7.84), and later, as father and daughter are taken to prison,
he is pleased at the prospect of perpetual atonement: 'I'll kneel down,
/And ask of thee forgiveness: so we'll live . . .' (5.3.10-11).
Still, his insight is
at best flawed. That a catastrophe and such a great degree of unhappiness
has been necessary to elicit in Lear the acknowledgement of his faults and
the existence of human ingratitude has been held against him by many
readers. Shakespeare accepted no simple views on the complexities of life,
and Lear is distinctly not a perfectly reformed man. Strikingly, no trace
of guilt is found in his grief over Cordelia's death, and his enthusiasm
for imprisonment with her is disturbingly egocentric in his lack of any
sense other life, as was his original demand for love, in 1.1. This point
has been central to much recent feminist criticism of the play. However,
Cordelia acquiesces and so do most audiences; the play's emphasis on
forgiveness and redemption seems clear, and in this light, Lear's residual
defects are perhaps best viewed as evidence of Shakespeare's honesty about
human frailty. Finally, King Lear is a play that raises more questions
than it answers, and the extent to which Lear's tragedy is illuminating to
him—as opposed to us, for its potential for illumination is unquestionably
clear—remains for us to contemplate. Shakespeare doubtless believed that
there was a historical king of Britain named Lear, as is recorded in his
sources, but he is in fact a mythical figure. The name derives from a
Celtic god of the sea, Llyr. The legendary king is reported to have
founded the town of Leicester, whose name is related to his own (Lear 4
castrum, Latin for 'camp'). |
KING OF FRANCE |
King of France is the
suitor and later the husband of Cordelia, King Lear’s rejected daughter.
France, as the king is called, appears only in 1.1. He recognizes the
honesty and virtue in Cordelia and thus emphasizes Lear's moral
blindness. He agrees to marry her, saying 'She is herself a dowry'
(1.1.240), and takes her back to France. Cordelia is thus absent for most
of the action as her sisters humiliate and banish their father. The Earl
of Kent soon knows that 'from France there comes a power' (3.1.30) to aid
Lear, but France himself does not reappear; he has returned home to deal
with 'something he left imperfect in the state' (4.3.3), while a French
general unsuccessfully attempts to re-establish Lear on the throne. The
subject of foreign invasion was a touchy one in Shakespeare's day because
Protestant England felt threatened by Catholic enemies, including France,
and scholars believe that the playwright found it expedient, in view of
government Censorship, to deemphasize the role of France, both man and
country, in King Lear. |
BURGUNDY |
Duke of Burgundy is a
suitor who rejects Cordelia when she is disinherited by King Lear.
Burgundy appears only in 1.1; he and the King of France have been summoned
to determine which of them will marry Lear's youngest daughter and thus
govern one-third of Britain. Burgundy's concern is with a politically and
materially advantageous match, and when Cordelia is disinherited he simply
loses interest in her. She dismisses his frank but polite apology cooly,
saying, 'Peace be with Burgundy! / Since that respect and fortunes are his
love, /I shall not be his wife' (1.1.246-248). Burgundy's conventionally
greedy behavior contrasts tellingly with the response of France, who
recognizes Cordelia's virtues and marries her. The Duke's equal footing
with the King of France reflects a reality of medieval Europe: the Duchy
of Burgundy, though formally a client state of France, was an independent
and wealthy country. However, this medieval context is an anachronism, for
in the early period in which King Lear is set the Duchy of Burgundy did
not yet exist. |
CORNWALL |
Duke of Cornwall is
the villainous husband of King Lear’s usurping daughter Regan. Cornwall
takes a prominent part in the evil deeds that spark much of the play's
action. In 2.1 he declares that Edgar, who has been falsely accused of a
murder plot against his father, Gloucester, shall be executed, and he
adopts as a follower Edgar's persecutor, Edmund. He places Lear's loyal
follower Kent in the stocks and he supports his wife and sister-in-law
Goneril in their expulsion of Lear. At his most cruel, in 3.7 he puts out
Gloucester's eyes when the earl remains loyal to the outcast former king.
For this offence he is killed by an appalled Servant, as is reported in
4.2 by a Messenger). His death is proof that the triumph of villainy will
not be total, but at the same time the enormity of his final deed
contributes greatly to the general atmosphere of horror that so
distinguishes the play. |
ALBANY |
Duke of Albany is the
virtuous but weak husband of Leap’s villainous daughter, Goneril. Albany,
who does not discover his wife's wickedness until too late, eventually
aids the banished Lear and formally restores him to power just before his
death. In this way he represents an instance of moral growth in a degraded
world. At the play's close he is the ruler of Britain, sharing power with
Edgar and Kent, and intent on repairing the damage to the state that
Lear's crisis has produced. In the final lines, Albany offers a possible
lesson to be drawn from the tragedy, saying, 'The weight of this sad time
we must obey' (5.3.322); he recognizes the need to be aware of human
susceptibility to catastrophic error, as Lear did not. (Albany's lines
here are sometimes given to Edgar, as in the First Folio text.)
In his early
appearances Albany is ineffectual. He is governed entirely by his wife,
who dismisses his question about her rift with Lear by curtly ordering,
'Never afflict yourself to know more of it' (1.4.289). After Act 1 he does
not reappear until 4.2, when, having learned of the treacherous blinding
of Gloucester, he denounces Goneril as an evil-doer. 'You are not worth
the dust which the rude wind / Blows in your face', he declares
(4.2.30-31). Nevertheless, he goes along with her alliance with Edmund
against Cordelia’s French army, though he privately asserts his intention
to revenge Gloucester. Informed by Edgar of Edmund and Goneril's plot
against his own life, Albany exposes the villains in 5.3. By this time
Albany is clearly intent on rectifying the misdeeds of his wife and her
allies, but his earlier weakness has already helped them. His poor
judgment in patriotically fighting the French has an unintended and fatal
result when Edmund gains control of Lear and Cordelia. Thus, though well
intentioned and finally benevolent, Albany reinforces the play's theme of
human fallibility. |
KENT |
Earl of Kent is a
nobleman faithful to King Lear. Kent attempts to dissuade the king from
his catastrophic decision to banish Cordelia when she honestly admits that
her love will go to her husband as well as her father, but Lear banishes
him as well for interfering. Kent then disguises himself and attempts to
assist Lear when he is rejected by his other daughters, Regan and Goneril.
He succeeds in keeping Lear safe from possible murder, and he reunites the
king and Cordelia at Dover. His conflict with Goneril's steward Oswald
stresses an important value in the play, the association of virtue with
gentlemanly behavior. Kent's steadfast honesty and loyalty is contrasted
with the courtier's self-serving ambition. However, when Cordelia's
invasion fails and she and Lear are captured by Edmund, Kent is helpless.
As he witnesses Lear's death at the play's close, he exclaims, 'Break,
heart; I prithee, break!' (5.3.311). Whether he refers to his own heart or
Lear's, this forsaken cry is emblematic of the sorrowful view of
humanity's plight that is an important theme of the play. Yet Kent's final
declaration of his own imminent death, 'I have a journey, sir, shortly to
go; / My master calls me, I must not say no' (5.3.320-321) also
contributes to the play's sense of the nobility of human suffering.
Kent corresponds to a
character named Perillus in Shakespeare's chief source for Lear, the play
KING LEIR (c. 1588). Some scholars think Shakespeare may have played
Perillus for the Chamberlain’s Men in the 1590s, for a number of passages
in the older play are especially closely echoed in Lear when Kent is
onstage. |
GLOUCESTER |
Earl of Gloucester is
the father of Edgar and Edmund. Gloucester is the central figure of the
play's subplot, in which his illegitimate son Edmund's villainy and his
own error lead him to disaster and suffering from which he recovers only
to die. This progression parallels the story of King Lear in the main
plot. Deceived by Edmund, who wants to inherit the earldom, Gloucester
disinherits and banishes his legitimate son Edgar. Because Gloucester is
faithful to the outcast and insane Lear, Edmund turns him over to Lear's
enemy, the Duke of Cornwall, who puts out Gloucester's eyes and banishes
him into the wilderness. Edgar, disguised as a wandering lunatic, tends to
his father. He saves him from suicide, in 4.6, and renews in him the
strength to endure. Finally, however, when Gloucester learns Edgar's
identity, the old man dies; 'his flaw'd heart, . . . 'Twixt two extremes
of passion, joy and grief, / Burst smilingly' (5.3.195-198).
Gloucester's tale
offers a significant parallel to that of Lear; like the king's,
Gloucester's tragedy is self induced, for his actual blinding is preceded
by figurative blindness when he fails to see either Edgar's virtue or
Edmund's villainy. Like Lear, Gloucester recogniszs his error—'I stumbled
when I saw' (4.1.19), he confesses—when it is too late. His helpless
wanderings, dependent on the aid of a seeming lunatic, suggest powerfully
the similar straits of the mad king. The similarity between the two
reaches a horrific climax, in 4.6, when they encounter each other on the
beach at Dover; it is one of the most touching passages in Shakespeare.
The mad and the blind old men recognize each other and acknowledge their
joint status as victims; their consciousness, though it is flawed by their
handicaps, is clearly more acute than it was before. Their parallel tales,
and the close sympathy of Lear and Gloucester when they meet, is highly
significant for our interpretation of the play's final moments.
Gloucester's death immediately precedes Lear's at the close of the play,
and because their parallel development has been stressed, we may read in
the king's death the same 'extremes of passion' and presume that his
heart, too, 'burst smilingly'. Thus, Gloucester's tragedy helps confirm
the nobility of human suffering, a central message of the play. |
EDGAR |
Edgar is the banished
son of the Earl of Gloucester. Misled by his illegitimate son Edmund,
Gloucester formally exiles Edgar to the wilderness; this action parallels
King Lear’s rejection of his daughter Cordelia. In 2.3 under threat of
execution, Edgar disguises himself as a wandering lunatic. When Lear is
banished by his villainous daughters the disguised Edgar accompanies him,
in 3.4 and 3.6. When Gloucester is blinded and expelled because he has
remained loyal to Lear, Edgar, still disguised, becomes his father's
guide, in 4.1, and saves him from suicide and a murder attempt by Oswald,
in 4.6. In Act 5 Edgar finally takes control of the play, exposing Edmund
and Goneril’s plot to murder the Duke of Albany and defeating Edmund in a
trial by combat. At the play's close Edgar is invited by Albany to share
in the rule of Britain; with his final lines, he offers a possible lesson
to be drawn from the play—that we must be aware of our human
susceptibility to folly, as Lear was not—saying, 'The weight of this sad
time we must obey' (5.3.322). (In some editions these lines are given to
Albany.)
As the insane Tom
O'Bedlam, Edgar embodies the play's theme of disease and misery as
products and emblems of human folly. Tom blames his insanity on his sexual
promiscuity, thus illustrating the morbid attitude towards sex that
permeates the world of the play. Similarly, when he is again himself,
Edgar attributes Gloucester's tragedy to 'The dark and vicious place'
(5.3.171) where Edmund was conceived, that is, to sex outside of
marriage.
On the other hand,
Edgar's loving loyalty to his father parallels Cordelia's to Lear. Both
present a Christlike willingness to sacrifice themselves that is often
cited as a lesson in accepting the will of God. Even from a non-religious
viewpoint, Edgar is an agent of redemption, preserving order and goodness
where chaos and evil have threatened by acting as a guide and savior first
for Lear, then for his father, and finally for Britain as a whole. When he
saves his father from suicide, in 4.6, he offers a way to renew acceptance
of life. Deceiving Gloucester into believing he has jumped from a cliff
and lived, Edgar declares his father's survival to be 'a miracle'
(4.6.55); the blind man concludes that he should not give in to despair,
but endure. Thus, Edgar illuminates a basic principle that is at the core
of the tragedy: we must struggle to make the best of our lives, accepting
death only when its time comes. As he says to his father, 'Men must endure
/ Their going hence, even as their coming hither: / Ripeness is all'
(5.2.9-11). |
EDMUND |
Edmund is the
unscrupulous and ambitious illegitimate son of the Earl of Gloucester.
Edmund' conspires against his legitimate brother Edgar, who is banished
into the wilderness in 2.1; he betrays his father to King Lear’s evil
daughter Regan and her husband, the Duke of Cornwall, who put out the old
man's eyes, in 3.7; and he pursues a love affair with Lear's other
daughter Goneril, with whom, in 4.2, he plots to murder her husband, the
Duke of Albany. When Cornwall is killed the widowed Regan schemes to take
Edmund from Goneril, and this unsavory love triangle is an important part
of the play's atmosphere of moral collapse.
In Act 5 Edmund leads
Cornwall's army against the supporters of Lear's faithful daughter
Cordelia; victorious, he thwarts Albany's plans for mercy and imprisons
Lear and Cordelia, ordering their execution. Edgar learns of the plot
against Albany, charges Edmund with treason and challenges him to a trial
by combat, wounding him fatally. The dying Edmund confesses his intention
towards Lear, but it is too late to prevent Cordelia's death, and Lear
dies of a broken heart soon thereafter.
Edmund's villainy is
a central element in King Lear; his schemes are crisply executed
and do much to pro- vide a dramatic structure in the subplot that the more
idea-oriented main story lacks. However, Edmund is a stereotypical villain
with little human complexity—his deeds are more interesting than he is
himself—and his schemes are effective due to the moral weakness of others,
not his compelling personality. His declaration of repentance—'some good I
mean to do / Despite of mine own nature' (5.3.242-243)—is perfunctory and
unconvincing. It serves to spark the final episode—Lear's fatal
grief—after which Edmund is carried away to die. Albany's brusque
dismissal of the news of his death demonstrates the extent of the
villain's defeat; compared to the lessons to be absorbed from Lear's end,
Edmund's demise is 'but a trifle here' (5.3.294).
Shakespeare
identified Edmund's unscrupulous ambition with a troubling social
phenomenon of his own day, the rise of the new commercially active
classes—the bourgeoisie of the cities and the lesser landowners, or
gentry, of the countryside. The success of these groups depended on their
willingness to engage in trade and banking, as opposed to the traditional
dependence on the land, and in this they were at odds with the great
territorial nobles of the old aristocracy. A worldly emphasis on
practical finance characterized the commercial classes, and this was
regarded as unscrupulous by hostile eyes. From this point of view, Edmund
represents the new man in his lack of chivalric scruples and his concern
for his own advancement.
Traditionalists
conventionally associated such an attitude with a new, 'modern' strain of
thought, and Edmund quite plainly identifies himself with this new mode.
In his first soliloquy he declares, 'Thou, Nature, art my goddess'
(1.2.1), boldly stating his independence of'the plague of custom' (1.2.3)
and its manmade moral standards. Such sophisticated agnosticism arose in
part from the Renaissance rediscovery of classical paganism, and it was
reflected in such works as the Essays of Montaigne, which Shakespeare had
read and which he admired in some respects. However, in placing these
sentiments in the mouth of a self-proclaimed villain, Shakespeare declares
his alliance with the old world of the aristocracy that is quite clearly
represented by Lear, Gloucester, and Edgar, Edmund's enemies. |
CURAN |
Curan is a follower
of the Earl of Gloucester. In 2.1 Curan tells Edmund of a rumor that the
Dukes of Cornwall and Albany—the husbands of Regan and Goneril, to whom
King Lear has foolishly given power—are soon to fall into civil war. This
is the first hint that Lear's error, already disastrous for him
personally, is also a potential catastrophe for the kingdom as a whole. |
Old Man |
Old man is a a vassal of the Earl of
Gloucester. In 4.1 the Old Man escorts the blind Gloucester who has had
his eyes put out by the evil Duke of Cornwall. The demoralized and
fatalistic Gloucester orders him away, but the Old Man observes that he
has been tenant to the Earl and his father for 'fourscore years' (4.1.14)
and does not obey until he has turned his master over to an escort, the
wandering lunatic Tom O'Bedlam (who is actually Gloucester's son, Edgar,
in disguise). The frailty of the Old Man emphasizes Gloucester's weakness,
while at the same time his devotion offers evidence that some good remains
in the increasingly violent and evil world of the play. |
Doctor |
Doctor is a physician
who reports to Cordelia on the condition of her father, King Lear. In 4.4
he tells Cordelia that Lear's sanity can be restored through rest, saying,
'Our foster nurse of nature is repose' (4.4.12). He assures her that he
can provide drugs to sedate the mad king. Later, he oversees the touching
reunion of the rested Lear with his daughter. He ends the meeting for the
good of his patient, but again reassures Cordelia that 'the great rage ...
is kili'd in him' (4.7.78-79). His kindly ministrations contrast with the
evil that has permeated Lear's world to this point. |
Fool |
Fool is the court
jester to King Lear. The Fool sees that Lear should not have rejected
Cordelia and placed himself in the power of Regan and Goneril, and he
repeatedly reminds his master of this. He employs barbed quips, for
instance, having caused Lear to observe that 'nothing can be made out of
nothing', the Fool remarks,'. . . so much the rent of his land comes to'
(1.4.130-132). He also utters simple truths, such as 'Thou should'st not
have been old till thou hadst been wise' (1.5.41-42). He strives to use
his wit to ease Lear's mind as the king goes insane, and he accompanies
him into the stormy wilderness in Act 3. The Fool is last seen leaving
with Lear and Kent after Gloucester has warned them of a murder plot
against the king. His last line, 'And I'll go to bed at noon' (3.6.83),
suggests an early death, but his fate is not reported.
The Fool is deeply
moved by Lear's plight, but he is capable of detachment from it. Lear's
Fool shares with other Shakespearean jesters, such as Feste and
Touchstone, an irony that permits him to comment on the action of the
play, as does a Chorus. With jokes, riddles, and scraps of Song he
clarifies the central situation by commenting on it more intelligently
than the other characters. Especially pertinent is his observation, '. . .
the Fool will stay, / And let the wise man fly' (2.4.79-80); with it he
makes a declaration of loyalty that helps contrast a moral world with the
tragic one that dominates the play. Similarly, his sanity is a foil for
Lear's increasing disintegration.
The Fool is closely
associated with Cordelia at two significant points. Before his first
entrance in 1.4.72, he is said to have 'much pined away' for her, the
first mention of Lear's daughter since her departure in 1.1. At the play's
close, Lear, grieving over Cordelia's corpse, says, 'And my poor fool is
hang'd' (5.3.304). 'Fool' was a common term of endearment in Shake-
speare's day, and Lear may simply be referring to his lost daughter, but
the playwright nevertheless takes the occasion to compare the two
characters. The Fool resembles Cordelia in both his devotion to Lear and
his commitment to a truthful assessment of life. He replaces her as the
exponent of these virtues during her long absence from the play, in fact,
some scholars suggest that the two roles may have been taken by the am'e
actor in the original productions by the King’s Men. Others, however, hold
that the part of the Fool was probably played by the famed comedian Robert
Armin, whose notoriety would have made him an unlikely Cordelia. |
OSWALD |
Oswald is the steward
of King Lear’s villainous daughter Goneril. In 1.3 Oswald coolly accepts
Goneril's instructions to treat her father insolently, for she wishes to
humiliate him thoroughly. In 1.4 Oswald acts upon these orders. Thus, the
steward is identified with his mistress as a villain, and when Lord Kent
beats him and drives him away, we approve. In 2.2 Kent encounters Oswald
again and berates him in a long, comical series of insults that focus on
the steward's pretensions to gentlemanly status. Kent's speech is a
scathing critique of the vain, self serving 'glass-gazing,
super-serviceable' (2.2.16-17) courtier that Oswald seems to be. Less
prominent after these encounters, Oswald principally serves Goneril as a
messenger, until, in 4.5, he delivers a letter to Regan and accepts her
implied commission to kill the outcast and blinded Earl of Gloucester.
When he encounters Gloucester in the next scene he attempts to do so, only
to be killed himself by the blind man's son, Edgar. With his dying breath
he begs his killer to make amends by delivering his letters. He thus
demonstrates loyalty to his mistress—he is indeed
'super-serviceable'—while at the same time he reveals her secrets and
provides for her ultimate downfall in the final scene.
Oswald represents a
familiar character type found in the satirical comedy of Jacobean Drama, a
caricature of an ambitious commoner attempting to climb into aristocratic
social circles. The rise of the gentry and the birth of the bourgeoisie
during the reigns of Queen Elizabeth and King James I i resulted in a
crisis of confidence among the aristocracy, who attempted to distinguish
themselves from the newly rich by insisting on proper manners and values.
This social conflict is the subject of humor in many plays of the period.
In the clash between Kent and Oswald the advantage is given clearly to the
old nobility at the expense of the rising class, reflecting Shakespeare's
conservative social instincts. Some scholars have speculated that Oswald
is further intended as a satire on an actual person, perhaps William
Farington, the obnoxious steward of the Elizabethan theatre patron Lord
Strange, but this cannot be proven. |
Captain |
Officer is the
murderer of King Lear’s daughter Cordelia. In 5.3 Edmund orders the
Officer, a captain (designated as 'Captain' in some editions), to kill the
captured king and his daughter, hanging Cordelia to make her death seem a
suicide. The officer is a petty representative of the evil that permeates
the play. He responds to Ed mund's promise of reward in a cynically
mercenary spirit, saying 'I cannot draw a cart nor eat dried oats; / If it
be man's work I'll do 't' (5.3.39-40). He succeeds in disposing of
Cordelia, but he is killed by her father as he does so as we learn from
Lear himself in 5.3.273. |
Gentleman |
Gentleman is a follower
of Lear. The Gentleman assists the loyal Kent in his efforts to aid the
wandering and insane king. Primarily a useful attendant, the Gentleman
delivers two important descriptions that help form the audience's
responses to the play in significant ways. In 3.1 he reports vividly to
Kent on Lear's raging in the storm and prepares the audience for the wild
scene to follow. In 4.3 he movingly describes Cordelia’s haunting response
to the news of her wretched father. Rich in religious imagery, this
passage provides a strong sense of Cordelia's saintly nature, a central
image of the play. Also a second Gentleman is a follower of the Duke of
Albany. In 5.3, the horrified Gentleman announces the deaths of Goneril
and Regan. Goneril has stabbed herself after confessing that she poisoned
Regan. The character adds to the increasing hysteria of the final scene.
|
Servants |
Servants are members
of the household of the Duke of Cornwall. In 3.7, one of the Servants,
designated the First Servant, attacks Cornwall in an effort to prevent him
from barbarously putting out the eyes of the Earl of Gloucester. The First
Servant is killed, but he wounds the duke, who dies later. The Second and
Third Servants assist the wounded Gloucester and they comment on the evil
natures of the duke and his wife Regan. The episode stresses the horror
that has been loosed by King Lear’s folly in granting power to Regan and
her sister Goneril. At the same time, the Servants demonstrate that good
still resides in some people, and thereby offer some relief from the
increasing violence and terror of the plot. |
GONERIL |
Goneril is one
of the villainous daughters of King Lear. Goneril and her sister Regan
declare their great love for Lear, in 1.1, when in fact they merely want
the portion of his kingdom that he has foolishly promised to whichever
daughter can assure him she loves him most. They share the prize when
their honest younger sister Cordelia enrages the king with a frank
admission that her love will be given in part to her future husband.
Goneril takes the lead in the two sisters' villainy. She introduces the
idea of humiliating Lear, in 1.1, and she orders her steward, Oswald, to
commence the practice, in 1.3. In 1.4 she starts the dispute over Lear's
followers that sends the ex-king fleeing into the storm, where he descends
into madness. In 4.2 Goneril's wickedness becomes more pronounced as she
enters into a love affair with the ambitious Edmund and hints at the
existence of a murder plot against her husband, the virtuous but weak Duke
of Albany. She and Regan both desire Edmund, and Goneril declares that she
would rather lose the battle against the avenging forces led by Cordelia
than lose Edmund to her sister. This rivalry depicts the vicious sexuality
that is part of the play's general atmosphere of moral and physical
unhealthiness. When Goneril and Edmund's plot against Albany is exposed,
she poisons Regan and then commits suicide as the Gentleman reports in
5.3.225-226.
Goneril's
extravagantly evil nature is so boldly and unsubtly drawn that only her
greater aggression distinguishes her from her sister. Her manipulation of
her husband foreshadows Shakespeare's Lady Macbeth, but Goneril, a less
sophisticated creation, is simply an imitation of a standard male villain,
cruel and ambitious. Unlike Lady Macbeth, she cannot compare herself with
conventional femininity, nor does she succumb to illness through a bad
conscience, for she is a much less complex character and serves chiefly as
an emblem of evil. |
REGAN |
Regan is one of the
villainous daughters of King Lear. In 1.1 Regan and her sister Goneril
hypocritically claim to love their father in order to share the portion of
the kingdom lost by the honest Cordelia, their younger sister, who frankly
admits that her husband as well as her father will receive a share other
love. Regan follows Goneril's lead, and they humiliate Lear once he has
surrendered power to them and their husbands. She is led on also by her
husband, the Duke of Cornwall, and supports him when he performs the
play's most appalling act of cruelty and puts out the eyes of the Earl of
Gloucester, in 3.7. Cornwall is killed while performing this deed, and
Regan sets her sights on Goneril's lover, the ambitious Edmund, but her
stronger sister poisons her. Regan is last seen as she withdraws, overcome
by sickness. Only later is word other death, and of Goneril's confession
as to its cause, brought to the other characters. Regan is the least
distinguished of the play's villains, being chiefly a follower of her
sister and her husband, though her somewhat cool and aloof quality
presents a contrast with the more energetic Goneril. |
CORDELIA |
Cordelia is the
virtuous daughter whom King Lear mistakenly rejects. Knowing she will
marry, Cordelia refuses to assert that all of her love will forever go to
her father, unlike Regan and Goneril, her hypocritical sisters. Lear
mistakes Cordelia's honesty for a lack of affection and disinherits her,
though the King of France recognizes her innate worth and marries her
anyway. She leaves Britain with him at the end of 1.1 and does not
reappear until Act 4, when she arrives with an army. She intends to
restore her father to his throne, for he has been humiliated and banished
to the wilderness by Regan and Goneril. Lear and Cordelia are reunited,
but are nonetheless defeated in battle, and the villainous Edmund
imprisons them and orders their murder, in 5.3. Although Edmund is
defeated by Edgar it is too late; the assassin has killed Cordelia, though
Lear kills him. In the play's final episode Lear grieves over his
daughter's corpse and dies of a broken heart.
During her long
absence from the play we are not permitted to forget Cordelia, for her
goodness and self-sacrifice are central to the tragedy: the Fool is said
to have 'much pined away' for her, in 1.4.72; in 2.2, the loyal Kent
reveals that she knows of Lear's situation; Lear himself refers to her in
2.4.211; and her invasion force is mentioned several times, beginning in
3.1.30.
Many commentators
believe that Shakespeare specifically intended Cordelia as an example of
the Christian virtues of self-sacrifice and acceptance of God's will.
Cordelia accepts her undeserved fate while she displays undiminished love
for her erring father. In this view she is a Christ like figure in a pagan
world who offers a suggestion of Christianity's coming redemption of
humanity. Her death thus symbolizes Christ's crucifixion, and the
tragedy's lesson is the mysterious nature of God's will. A non-religious
interpretation of Cordelia's sacrifice is also proposed by many critics,
who see her virtue as its own reward, for as a pagan she lacks the
Christian's promise of recompense in the afterlife. In this humanistic
view her goodness inspires our admiration all the more for being
unrewarded, and the pure light of her courage offers the most compelling
sense that the play's tragedy is not utterly futile. Also,
many critics hold that Shakespeare intended Lear to die believing that
Cordelia is still alive, in which case his own fate is greatly eased, and
we can feel more strongly the redemptive effect of her virtues. A final
variation on her importance does not diminish it: some writers hold that
King Lear reflects a despairing and pessimistic view of life that denies
aid for human folly in a tragic universe. In this interpretation
Cordelia's virtues, combined with the injustice of both her rejection by
her father and her ultimate death, offer striking confirmation of the dire
point of view attributed to the playwright.
In almost any view Cordelia's manifest virtue is a dominating element of
the play, giving her an importance seemingly unjustified by her relatively
few appearances on stage. In her pure honesty and unqualified love she
seems almost devoid of ordinary human personality traits, and her saintly
qualities are especially stressed by the Gentleman who reports on her in
4.3, preparing the audience for her return to the drama. In a passage rich
in imagery and rhetoric he describes her mingled joy and sorrow at news of
Lear, saying, for instance, '. . . she shook / The holy water from her
heavenly eyes' (4.3.29-30). Later, she is described as one 'Who redeems
nature from the general curse' (4.6.203). Evoked in these terms, Cordelia
resembles an angel more than she does a worldly character. Her vague
personality contributes to our sense of dislocation in King Lear. She is
remote from the more active figures, even the fighters against evil,
Edgar, Kent, and Albany, and this draws attention to the failure of human
interaction in the play's tragic universe.
Cordelia may also be seen in a more human light, in act some writers
declare that she exhibits a prideful stubbornness in Act 1, only adopting
an attitude of loving generosity when she sees the damage that has been
done. In this light her moral progress may be said to parallel that of her
father. This is a minority view, however, for most commentators feel that
Shakespeare intended her initial insistence on honesty to be an obvious
virtue. |
Messenger |
Messenger is a
servant of Regan. In 4.2 the Messenger interrupts a dispute between
Goneril and Albany with the news that Gloucester has been blinded and
Cornwall is dead. Goneril immediately withdraws to plan her selfish
response to the latter event, in contrast to her husband's shocked dismay
over the former. The Messenger then adds that Gloucester had been betrayed
by his son Edmund. The episode stresses the evil that Albany realises he
must oppose as the play approaches its climax.
A second messenger is
a follower of Cordelia. In 4.4 the Messenger brings his mistress the news
that the armies of Goneril and Regan are approaching. His brief
announcement immediately throws the newly arrived Cordelia into the fury
of battle, and thereby increases the play's pace as it reaches its climax. |
Officer |
Officers are the followers of the Duke
of Albany. In 5.3.109 an Officer relays Albany's order for a trumpet
blast. A little later, an Officer (perhaps the same one) is sent after the
fleeing Goneril, but he does not speak. When it is learned that an
assassin has been ordered to kill Cordelia and Lear, a different Officer
(the pursuer of Goneril does not return) is sent to prevent him. He
returns and confirms, in half a line (5.3.274), Lear's account of how he
killed Cordelia's murderer. The Officers, whether two or three in number,
function merely to swell the ranks of the victorious Albany's entourage in
the busy climactic moments of the play. |
To view other King
Lear sections:
Main Play
Page Play Text
Scene by Scene Synopsis
Character Directory Commentary
To view the other Plays
click below:
By Comedies
Histories
Romances Tragedies
To view other
Shakespeare Library sections:
Biography Plays
Poems
Sonnets Theaters
Shake Links
|